In fact, I am little confused by the Class status page on mono web site. For every class portion(e.g. System.Data, System.XML), System.Reflection.* is always listed there, I don't know why place them before it.
I think it's more pratical to take mono as a Linux Server Platform, then try to expand it to desktop. I have heard several companies that want to use mono as its server side platform, and take Windows .NET as client side platform(for C/S application). > -----Original Message----- > From: Rodrigo Moya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:28 PM > To: code > Cc: Mono List > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Mono as a Server Platform > > > On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 07:21, code wrote: > > Hi, all, > > > > Could anyone tell me how far mono is to be a server > platform? It need > > not to have GUI, but database support, network, remoting services, > > XML, and other stuff required by a server platform. I don't > know if I > > could use it now, or have to wait for several month, or a year? > > > database support is almost there > > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
