If memory serves me right, Paolo Molaro wrote: > It may just be because I'm not a native speaker, but when there is a > header + data and someone talks about the "length of the actual data" > it quite clearly means the length refers to the length of data, not > data+header. In the table it contradict itself and says that the > DataSize needs the +4 (the header size).
I'm not a native speaker either ,but the interpretation is quite equivocal. ... "length of actual data" might be considered as the size of "data as in file" which includes the +4 as well or otherwise. > The fact the peverify doesn't complain probably means that the behaviour > is fine (as long as it's done in the last section). Hmm.... last section ? ... Isn't the +4 generated for each section ? > Anyway, I'll change reflection to output the header size as currently > produced by csc since it actually doesn't change anything for mono. Gopal -- Shh.. be very very quiet, I'm hunting wabbits.. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
