On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 04:14, Zaphod wrote: > > I don't know ... I just read the FAQ ... and found this curious .. it is > not often that I see an OSS project say this explicitly in their FAQ ...
Two projects I can think of that have this arrangement are Cygwin and Ghostscript. Both are stellar Open Source projects. The existence of an alternative closed source licensing arrangements is not a problem as long as the open source version is active and up to date. > There are some projects that had people to think it was free and then later > pushed a non-free release (Sourceforge ?) .. So I appreciate mono being > honest with their contributers .... I would start to worry if the free version of the project show signs of abandonment. But then again, a truly useful and intrinsically sustainable open source project will live on even after the original contributers leave the project. Ximian licensing their portion of the Mono code with a different license doesn't worry me a bit. -- Weiqi Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
