Hi, I think this kind of collabration would also be a good thing, I do agree with Steve that we should host in a neutral place and using sourceforge means we should be able to setup a list (thus we can avoid cross posting to mono/dotgnu lists) for all interested parties.
As JANET is not in the dotgnu tree we are not forking the code but rather allowing common libs to be shared across the projects. Thanks Andrew -----Original Message----- From: Dick Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2003 10:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Re: JavaScript and Mono On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:14, Jeroen Janssen wrote: > Steve Newman wrote: > > >It turns out I got the story wrong. Rhys Weatherley has been working on an unrelated JScript implementation (very recently announced) that will be part of Portable.Net. (He didn't know about JANET, and I didn't know about his project.) As part of a broader effort to ensure general compatability, Gopal is has been testing to see whether JANET runs under Portable.Net. But JANET will not be part of Portable.Net and it has not been checked into the Portable.Net source tree. > > > > > Is it interesting to see if we can work together with Rhys on a JScript > implementation that can/will be used by both projects? Having multiple implementations of the spec is a good thing. This doesn't mean they can't cooperate, or even share chunks of code, though. - Dick _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
