Test with 4.2.2. done! Here the report:
1. If I enable ONLY armeabi all is fine. The /libs folder contains all the .so expected. (my standard configuration) 2. If I enable armeabi and armeabi-v7a the /libs folder contains only the libmonodroid.so. So the app wont work (I usually do not enable armeabi-v7a) In your opinion, is there any performance loss running armeabi rutime over an v7a device? I'm asking this because I have two scenario now: - Stay with the 4.2.2 and keep only the armeabi .so lib - Upgrade to the 4.2.3 and add the armeabi-v7a .so lib to the project (I would prefer to do this only if there are noticeable performances improvements for v7a enabled devices) thanks Francesco On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:28 PM, Francesco Colombo wrote: > > The device is a Galaxy Samsung S2, the android version installed on it > is 2.3.3 > > Keep in mind that with the m4a 4.2.2 version, all was fine! > > Would you mind running a test for me? :-) > > If you have a 4.2.2 install around, or don't mind going back to 4.2.2, > could you: > > 1. Edit your Project Properties and enable both armeabi AND armeabi-v7a > runtimes > 2. Clean, Build, Install your app > 3. `adb shell ls -l /data/data/your.package.name/lib` > > Does (3) contain all the native libraries that it should? In my testing, > it doesn't: > > https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5748#c2 > http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=9089 > > Thanks, > - Jon > > _______________________________________________ > Monodroid mailing list > [email protected] > > UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid >
_______________________________________________ Monodroid mailing list [email protected] UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid
