In message <[email protected]> on Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:46:07 -0800, Zack Weinberg <[email protected]> said:
zackw> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Richard Levitte <[email protected]> wrote: zackw> > Modern versions of dh are quite capable and really need a very small zackw> > debian/rules. From that point of view, the current 'rules' in zackw> > org.debian.monotone{,.for-mtn-1.0} looks overly complicated and zackw> > frankly, aged, and with hack upon hack, it's gotten a bit tangled to zackw> > boot. Does anyone mind if I try to remake it into something simpler, zackw> > easier to follow? zackw> zackw> You're welcome to try, but the last time I tried, (which was not so zackw> long ago in Debian's terms) none of it could be deleted without zackw> breaking something. Note in particular that 'dh', AFAIK, still does zackw> not support the hacks that are necessary to prevent the manual from zackw> getting built on the buildds (which in turn is what keeps monotone zackw> transitions from getting entangled with TeXLive transitions, so we zackw> *really* do not want to lose that). It's still quite possible to keep those hacks, in form of overrides. It does mean, though, that all the standard junk kan be tossed and left to 'dh' to handle. A question about buildds, do they not build monotone-doc? Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte [email protected] http://richard.levitte.org/ "Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!" -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish _______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
