On 05/24/2014 12:38 PM, Francis Russell wrote: > Correction, please use this revision instead: > > 8303556f0339c4b3bc942b9d2022cb2c8d106c00 > > It fixes an additional couple of lintian warnings about hardened build > flags and targets in debian/rules.
Great, thanks. With that rev, monotone-viz builds fine on my Debian/testing box and passes a smoke test. I get the following set of lintian warnings: > N: Unpacking packages in group monotone-viz/1.0.2-3 > N: ---- > N: Processing changes file monotone-viz (version 1.0.2-3, arch source amd64) > ... > N: ---- > N: Processing source package monotone-viz (version 1.0.2-3, arch source) ... > P: monotone-viz source: duplicate-in-relation-field in source build-depends: > debhelper (>= 7), debhelper > W: monotone-viz source: package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9 > W: monotone-viz source: vcs-field-uses-unknown-uri-format vcs-mtn > mtn://monotone.ca/debian-mtn?org.debian.monotone-viz > E: monotone-viz source: invalid-standards-version 3.9.5.0. > P: monotone-viz source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature > N: ---- > N: Processing binary package monotone-viz (version 1.0.2-3, arch amd64) ... > P: monotone-viz: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL The one error and the duplicate debhelper B-D seemed simple to fix, so I did that in 0d99d764defcc7ed35002fecb942a0715e1f56be. I'm not quite sure about "package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9". debian/compat states 9, debian/control says: "debhelper (>= 7)". I'd also appreciate if the changelog would fit 80 columns. Not sure if that's required by the policy or not, though. Regards Markus Wanner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
