>From a UI standpoint, it sounds like all of this takes what most people need to do ( sync collections ) and made it more complex to do so. When monotone syncs on a regexep, do you still have a clear audit trail in the logs? Guess I need to play with the new code....
dan On 6/21/05, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently, on mainline, push/pull/sync have been changed to take a > regular expression instead of a collection -- collections don't exist > anymore. Functionally, this is great; UI-wise, I'm wondering how cool > it really is to be typing "net\.venge\.monotone(|\..*)" or whatever? > Would it be better to have a UI that took any number of globs, and > used those? So like: > $ monotone pull net.venge.monotone net.venge.monotone.* > would be equivalent to the above regexp; and > $ monotone pull net.venge.monotone* > would be equivalent to the current net.venge.monotone collection? > > Maybe with a --regexp switch that switches it over to being > interpreted as a regexp, for the cases when you want that? > > What do people think? > > -- Nathaniel > > -- > "If you can explain how you do something, then you're very very bad at it." > -- John Hopfield > > > _______________________________________________ > Monotone-devel mailing list > Monotone-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel > _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
