Howard Spindel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> As one other poster said, I'm a monotone newbie so I could be way off.
>
> How about *relative* human readable revision IDs rather than all of
> the absolute schemes posted so far?

Yes, that kind of thing has been suggested before.  I don't think
there was anything wrong with it.  I don't think there was any
implementation, though.

[...]



_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Reply via email to