On 10/4/05, Larry Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Undertaking any of the above would be a ton of work. And I am sadly not > volunteering to do it myself, or even contribute all that much code to it. > (Though I am working up a reasonably-clever JSON library, and I would love > to help define the shape of the JSON data, particularly the communications > protocol between the front- and back-ends.) I realize that waltzing into an > open-source project, vaguely sketching castles in the air, then saying "now > go build it guys!", easily strays into boorishness. So I apologize if I'm > stepping on any toes. > > > What do you think?
What about YAML (http://www.yaml.org/)? It could be useful too. Now, about the logic/frontend separation: I agree. Although the idea of a shared library was discouraged a while ago (cannot remember why exactly), your proposal of making a simple binary that just provides the "automate" layer and developing a frontend over it sounds good (from what I read on your comments; haven't used that interface myself). Kind regards, -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.livejournal.com/users/jmmv/ The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/ _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
