In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:10:54 +0100, Bruce 
Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

monotone> But if your certificate has all those decorations then it's
monotone> probably not so usable for other purposes, so I'd guess that
monotone> would diminish the "single signon" type argument for using
monotone> X.509?

Really?  Why?

monotone> I suspect that if monotone had an ssh-agent type system
monotone> (maybe even one that actually used ssh-agent, whether or not
monotone> it used ssh keys), then a lot of the irritation with using
monotone> monotone-specific keys would go?

Hmm, I think I recall Nathaniel talking about a monotone-agent a while
ago.  Or was that Graydon?

monotone> > But you'll have to wait until that RFC is implemented in
monotone> > OpenSSL :-).
monotone> 
monotone> OK, not for a couple of weeks, then?

Yeah, right...

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis


_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Reply via email to