In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:10:54 +0100, Bruce Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
monotone> But if your certificate has all those decorations then it's monotone> probably not so usable for other purposes, so I'd guess that monotone> would diminish the "single signon" type argument for using monotone> X.509? Really? Why? monotone> I suspect that if monotone had an ssh-agent type system monotone> (maybe even one that actually used ssh-agent, whether or not monotone> it used ssh keys), then a lot of the irritation with using monotone> monotone-specific keys would go? Hmm, I think I recall Nathaniel talking about a monotone-agent a while ago. Or was that Graydon? monotone> > But you'll have to wait until that RFC is implemented in monotone> > OpenSSL :-). monotone> monotone> OK, not for a couple of weeks, then? Yeah, right... Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
