On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:06:35AM -0700, Emile Snyder wrote: > > Scenario III: > > ............. > > I have a working copy and have commited local changes, which > > are commited: > > > > > > Ancestor -------> Newly received head > > \ > > \---> Working copy > > > > I would like to be able to do something like, [fantasy syntax follows] > > > > monotone diff --revision=lca:(h:|i:$(cat MT/revision)) --revision=h: > > > > for the differences between ancestor and newly received head. > > Hmmm. I can see the desire for such a thing here too, but appropriate > syntax totally fails me ;)
This is almost exactly the "what damage am I about to do with an 'update'?" query/scenario I spoke about recently. I'd really like some way to express this, too. -- Dan.
pgpC3ZCtjTJ5H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
