In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:59:21 +0100, Bruce Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
monotone> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: monotone> monotone> [...] monotone> monotone> > Ah, no, but you didn't have a chance to see what I see monotone> > before now. Just pull and look again and you'll see what monotone> > I mean (unless someone else pushes something new...). monotone> monotone> Ah, I see. Now 7e8d1d331d6fd71d84b0db6b48de9265371b6541 monotone> isn't regarded as a leaf, because it's been propagated to monotone> another branch. monotone> monotone> And that's likely to be common (and *is* common, looking at monotone> the graph), so regarding all such branch-crossings to be monotone> leaves wouldn't work. Absolutely, it has happened more than once. However, the visual oddity that you see right now hasn't been visible before, because we don't have a disconnected graph very often, so we usually see the leaf at the bottom, propagates or not. So it's not really as much of a problem as the current "disconnectedness". Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
