Howard Spindel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 03:08 AM 12/5/2005, Bruce Stephens wrote: > >>I can't see any particular support for >>constructing a group of databases disconnected from any other, for >>example. > > A group of databases disconnected from each other would be what a > consultant who deals with multiple clients, each of which has its own > monotone database, would have to deal with.
Certainly, I'm not saying it doesn't happen, or that it shouldn't happen, or that there aren't things that could be changed to make it more convenient. You wouldn't necessarily have to keep things disconnected, of course, provided everyone uses unique branch names, everything should be OK. For convenience a consultant might well choose to keep one or more databases for each client, of course. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
