In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:21:57 -0500, Yury 
Polyanskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

ypolyans> Now HOW to commit a tree as a child to TWO revisions? I.e. I
ypolyans> want current revision to be a child of revA and revB (as if
ypolyans> it were a merge, though I did all merging already and don't
ypolyans> need any monotone merge assistance).

You could actually do that back before the introduction of changesets,
since the ancestry was defined with "ancestor" certs.  It was
dangerous to do so, though, you could get som pretty loopy results
from that.

These days, you would probably have to create the revision yourself,
by hand, and sign it, insert it into the database along with all the
necessary deltas and files, and if you're playing with 0.26pre1, you'd
have to add a bunch of rosters manually, and I can't even begin to
tell you how to do that.  Either way, if you do that, be warned that
such a procedure is VERY ERROR-PRONE, so I just wouldn't go there if I
was you.

So, my question to you is, why didn't you use explicit_merge, and then
apply further changes on the resulting revision?  That would seem sooo
much simpler.

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis


_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Reply via email to