In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:29:00 -0400, Ethan 
Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

eblanton> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker spake unto us the following wisdom:
eblanton> > I'm sorry, why can't usher *be* the master server?  Adding
eblanton> > a master server in between would just add a layer of
eblanton> > complexity that gives nothing extra in return.
eblanton> 
eblanton> I for one would much rather the listening daemon didn't have
eblanton> to run with root privileges, such that it could execute
eblanton> servers as other users...

So your listening server would basically be a proxy that sends bit
back and forth between a remote client and a local master server
process.  In what way does that give you extra security?

I trust you don't run sshd, apache or any other server that requires
authentication and authorisation or is capable thereof, btw :-).

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis


_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Reply via email to