Nathaniel Smith schrieb:
Well, I found them interesting to read, anyway :-):
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/UserSurvey
Two quotes interesting to us would be (comments about other known SCM):
"Chose Monotone, got confused, switched to Mercurial."
I don't know anything about Mercurial (so I don't know how they handle
revisions,...), but as I started off with monotone, the hardest thing
for me was to "think in hashes" and to deal with 40 Byte long revision
numbers...
"Monotone is simply too slow to use, even on smallish trees on my dual
amd64."
The obvious bottle-neck IMHO is pulling large repos, like the monotone
one, as this takes far too long to do security checks there (as far as I
can remember what Nathaniel once told me). This would be definitely a
point for improvement. The other actions happen quite fast, and I have
no dual machine.
Thomas.
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
