Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:21:46PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Well, umm, blame cmarcelo, I guess :-):
http://del.icio.us/tag/monotone
Ah, right. That's Caio.
As a practical matter, I find it unlikely that the FSF will release a
GPL v3 that somehow cannot be applied to, say... gnupg.
Consult a lawyer etc. etc., but personally I'd just slap "v2 or later"
on it and worry about v3... later. Like, after it actually exists
:-).
I think you're right. I'm a bit of a paranoid when it comes to legal
issues, but OK -- GPL v2 it is!
You can also take the "or later" clause out and just say v2 specifically.
--
Matthew A. Nicholson
matt-land.com
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
