Nathaniel Smith writes:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:03:56AM -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311
> >
> > You can get the file from http://www.brianlane.com/OE.mtn.gz
>
> This file appears to contain some cached data generated by Eric
> Anderson's net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance branch. As is
> usual for such experiments, there hasn't been any work done to make
> sure it interoperates well with mainline monotone, or that there's any
> kind of reasonable migration path between them (or even between
> versions on that branch). You're of course free to use such branches,
> but it's at your own risk, and you need to make sure you know what
> you're doing...
Yea, it's a pity Brian didn't include the bug report in the e-mail; I
would have recognized it immediately. Someone build a database using
binary rosters -- these make things go much faster but immediately
fail when used with standard monotone. The only way back to an
all-mainline database is to do a monotone serve with the
experimental-performance branch monotone and do a pull with a normal
monotone.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
