Steven Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So, I was leaning towards something more like svn >> trunk >> branch/foo >> etc. >> > > That's one of the things that's broken about Subversion (or at least > most people's use of it) in my opinion. I think that there should be > no distinction other than local naming conventions between a "trunk" > and a "branch".
Subversion doesn't enforce any naming. Using "/trunk", "/branch/foo", "/tags/bar" or whatever *is* a local naming convention. [...] _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
