On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:52:48PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 9/20/06, Thomas Moschny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wednesday 20 September 2006 21:20 Shaun Jackman wrote: > >> The monotone-0.30.tar.gz tarball shipped with package_revision.txt set > >> to `unknown'. Should this be fixed? > > > >He who prepares the tarfile (i.e. Nathaniel) needs a recent mtn in his path > >for the new mechanism to work, so I guess it will be set to reasonable > >value > >again for the 0.31 release. > > It isn't. > > $ mtn --version > monotone 0.31 (base revision: unknown)
Err, well... $ mtn --version monotone 0.28 (base revision: 8c6ce7cb2ccd21290b435e042c2be4554ec6a048) I don't really _use_ the version in my path, so it lags a bit. (Also, that's the version in etch.) -- Nathaniel -- Details are all that matters; God dwells there, and you never get to see Him if you don't struggle to get them right. -- Stephen Jay Gould _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
