Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:13:39 +0100, Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:ulf> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: ulf> > You know, this wouldn't be such a problem if we could just teach ulf> > virtual domains to monotone, and have it select which database to use ulf> > for each session based on that. And really, it wouldn't have to be ulf> > very complicated either, would it?ulf> ulf> It doesn't entirely solve the problem, though. ulf> ulf> 1) it still doesn't give control over what someone can write toulf> the db It does if you associate separate write-permissions with the separate databases.
I mean that someone can still accidently push my.funny.branch to the wrong repository.
ulf> 2) it isn't possible to easily move branches between domains ulf> 3) it isn't possible to sync the entire thing (you'd still have ulf> to do multiple syncs) Well, of course not, but those things *are* orthogonal to having Hard Barriers between projects, which I thought was the main topic of this thread.
Not entirely. The barrier is setup according to your rights, so you can sync everything that you have access to in one go.
Cheers, -- Ulf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
