In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 23 May 2007 12:16:22 +0200, Markus Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
markus> > I'm sure some kernels have calls with which you can tune markus> > this kind of thing, but does it look the same everywhere? markus> > How about in Winblows? markus> markus> Is there a NFS implementation for Winblows? Or are you afraid markus> that Windows doesn't (or only poorly) cache stat() calls to markus> it's NTFS? Let's say that I've read the following page a few times too many: http://linuxmafia.com/cabal/os-suck.html Basically, I've been around too long to expect that everything is dandy everywhere, just because MY operating system does (just about) what I want exactly the way I want... markus> Although I'm more of a 'go-fix-the-underlying-implementation-issue!' markus> guy, I'm entirely with you there, but considering such fixes often trickle through slowly, or sometimes not at all, we still need to figure out what the best path is today. markus> you are probably right in that caching stat() results in markus> monotone is sufficiently easy to do. Doesn't look so hard at first sight at least. I'm working on other stuff right now, so all I've time for is talk a little bit ;-). markus> I'll try to come up with a patch (i.e. new revision). Good. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
