On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:20:51PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: > On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 17:04 -0600, Derek Scherger wrote: > > Timothy Brownawell wrote: > > > Here's a list of all nvm* branches, by whether they've been merged into > > > some other branch and the date on the latest head. I'd think that we > > > could also suspend most of the 'M' ones from this year. > > > > I was just wondering whether we could "suspend" these without actually > > suspending them. i.e. could we just not list a branch by default if its > > heads all have descendants and all of these descendants are not in the > > branch or something? I have a very vague recollection of talking about > > this a long while ago but don't remember where we ended up with it. > > That's probably not good, since it would hide eg viewmtn and usher, > which both have their most recent revisions merge-into-dir'd into > webhost. > > Hiding branches as a result of that sort of thing isn't a behavior I > think we want.
Not to mention that the trunk would regularly disappear every time someone pulled in trunk changes to a branch. -- Nathaniel -- "But suppose I am not willing to claim that. For in fact pianos are heavy, and very few persons can carry a piano all by themselves." _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel