Bruce Stephens schrieb: > cared about this could hack a monotone backend in a day or two; > maybe longer if it turned out that monotone needed extra automate > features, but I'd guess it wouldn't now that there's a way to > commit revisions. automate is definitely enough for hg2mtn...
> For that matter, I guess it might be feasible to read git's > fast-import format instead (that would probably take a bit more > effort, but might be more useful). I started such an effort, but considered it not worth it, as fast-import reveals too many of the details in git's design that differ from monotone. I particularily had issues with the differences in branches, and it was seriously slowed down by keeping my own directory tree model (as git doesn't handle directories at all). Summary: I got better results quicker by building a direct translation (it was hg2mtn in that case) instead of working around the differences to get a suitable mtn-fast-import. Regards, Patrick Georgi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
