Lapo Luchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Craig L. Ching wrote: >> Heh, I figured that but thought I'd just make sure, sometimes things >> aren't as obvious as they seem, not so in this case ;-) > > The most common source of dual-branched revisions is (I think) when you > "propagate" and no change is needed (a new branch cert is simply added, > as the message clearly states).
Just FYI, in this case I wanted to create a branch, but not commit any changes. This follows the CVS usage; create a branch tag, then commit changes on the branch. So I used "mtn cert" directly. -- -- Stephe _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
