Stephen Leake wrote: > Cygwin is also 32 bit. Yes, and won't be different anytime soon.
> Perhaps it should be: > o Windows (32 bit) _native_ _cygwin_ > There are people running 64 bit Windows now. I assume it has some sort > of "32 bit compatibility mode", but we should still make it clear. I do (run WinXP 64) and yes: it executes win32 code flawlessly (and thanks for it, as only 2-3 software in 100 support win64 :P). I guess the best is just to avoid nominating win64 until there's an ACTUAL win64 package... ;-) (and it's not like mtn really *needs* the extra power...) Lapo _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel