Thomas Moschny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
[...] >> Instead of trying to merge those certs together, I'd rather try to >> increase locality of those certs in the database as well as during >> netsync. That way, all certs would benefit, instead of only those which >> might possibly be used together. > > That's imho a different topic, and I'm not sure I already understood what you > mean by 'locality' here. Locality on disk, such that commonly the certs that you want to request are close together (and so more efficient to read). I guess lumping certs associated with a revision together might be good, but maybe not---maybe you want certs for a particular branch close together, and that that's much more important. I forget how drh suggested this could be done, but he did give some advice on the ml. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
