On Jan 29, 2008 9:41 AM, Patrick Georgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Take a hard look at licensing. > > libssl was (last time I looked) 4-clause bsd licensed (bsd + > advertising), and thus triggered the license incompatibility mode of the > GPL. > > There might be some GNU/GPL rewrite of it - at least something along > that lines was planned. But given that other libssl-using GPL sources > aren't build against such a replacement in the Debian repository (eg. > netatalk), I might be mistaken on it (or that project just isn't far > enough yet)
Could "dropbear" (a lightweight SSH2 server and client) be of help here? I have no experience handling various licenses, but a brief look into it's LICENSES file seem to indicate it's not incompatible with the GPL (didn't see any advertising clause). Regards, ~Nuno Lucas > Regards, > Patrick Georgi _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
