Holger Freyther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> Seriously I'm impressed what you have achieved with mtn, I like most of it, > but > in terms of improving the way I develop mtn is getting in my way more and more > often (and it is not the speed). I agree with you (I'm finding git fits much better with my working than monotone did, though there are certainly issues with git, too). However, I think speed matters too (a little to my surprise---monotone seemed fine, I guess compared with svk and GNU Arch (so not really tough competition)). But git's combination of speed and the knowledge that things can easily (and quickly) be discarded if they don't work out really pays off, IMHO. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
