On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 06:26:52PM -0400, Jack Lloyd wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:48:25PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > > Unrelated thought: would it make sense for mtn version --full to print
> > > out the version #s of the various libraries, since they are no longer
> > > fixed by the monotone version?
> >
> > Sounds like a good idea.
>
> I've attached a patch.
New version. Use the version macros for Botan instead of calling the
string function. Mostly for consistency with the rest of the version #
sources.
#
# old_revision [17398bbfe76852cb9ac73cf3cb13912050982e1a]
#
# patch "mt_version.cc"
# from [271946e05e232569f97b685e3354819a81683643]
# to [1e46c73a8a617ac7db3edd5ee9a8f06a28743046]
#
============================================================
--- mt_version.cc 271946e05e232569f97b685e3354819a81683643
+++ mt_version.cc 1e46c73a8a617ac7db3edd5ee9a8f06a28743046
@@ -19,8 +19,15 @@
#include <boost/version.hpp>
#include <boost/config.hpp>
+/* Include third party headers needed for version info */
+#include <botan/version.h>
+#include <sqlite3.h>
+// Lua assumed included by lua.hh
+#include <pcre.h>
+
#include "app_state.hh"
#include "cmd.hh"
+#include "lua.hh"
#include "platform.hh"
#include "mt_version.hh"
#include "package_revision.h"
@@ -74,12 +81,20 @@ get_full_version(string & out)
"C++ compiler : %s\n"
"C++ standard library: %s\n"
"Boost version : %s\n"
+ "SQLite version : %s\n"
+ "Lua version : %s\n"
+ "PCRE version : %d.%d\n"
+ "Botan version : %d.%d.%d\n"
"Changes since base revision:\n"
"%s")
% s
% BOOST_COMPILER
% BOOST_STDLIB
% BOOST_LIB_VERSION
+ % SQLITE_VERSION
+ % LUA_RELEASE
+ % PCRE_MAJOR % PCRE_MINOR
+ % BOTAN_VERSION_MAJOR % BOTAN_VERSION_MINOR % BOTAN_VERSION_PATCH
% string(package_full_revision_constant);
out = oss.str();
}
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
