In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:06:59 -0600, "Derek
Scherger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
derek> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
derek>
derek> > Debian:
derek> >
derek> > $ (cd /usr/lib && ls -l liblua*)
derek> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324860 2008-01-26 08:12 liblua5.1.a
derek> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 825 2008-01-26 08:12 liblua5.1.la
derek> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2008-04-01 11:39 liblua5.1.so ->
derek> > liblua5.1.so.0.0.0
derek> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2008-03-31 07:09 liblua5.1.so.0 ->
derek> > liblua5.1.so.0.0.0
derek> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 171696 2008-01-26 08:12 liblua5.1.so.0.0.0
derek> > $ (cd /usr/lib/pkgconfig && ls -l *lua*)
derek> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 857 2008-01-26 08:12 lua5.1.pc
derek> >
derek>
derek> Wow, that's odd. I thought the version numbers were supposed to come
*after*
derek> the .so, where all those, um, numbers are?
Yes. However, it seems like some packages make the library version
part of the library *name*, to make sure that you link against exactly
that version and none else.
Why they do so for lua, I've no idea...
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richard.levitte.org/
"Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!"
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
