Peter Stirling wrote:
Presumably the issue is not when it's only one revision. If you are
intent on malice then you could add 10,000,000 revisions, at which
point calling kill_rev_locally will be rather more effort, especially
if the revisions are signed by a (compromised or otherwise) key which
had some revisions that you don't want to delete.
Ok. So the encumberance attack becomes something more like a DOS attack.
Could you not use selectors to delete everything more recent than a
certain date that was signed by the compromised key?
Daniel.
PS: For those who missed my first email, here's the link to the article
I wrote:
http://daniel.carrera.name/Monotone_Security/
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
