Hi, Zack Weinberg wrote: > I will not have time to look at the code until later today or perhaps > even tomorrow. In the meantime: are you storing Unix-epoch second > counts in the database? If so, then yes, I object, for the reasons in > my second message.
No, I've only changed the internal representation of date_t to use (comparable) u64 seconds since Unix epoch, instead of storing strings. Maybe I need to check for performance issues, but I don't think this part is overly performance critical. Regards Markus Wanner _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
