Markus Wanner schrieb:
> Thomas Keller wrote:
>> I scanned over your patch and noticed only a little quirk: you've
>> introduced yet another command group ("git"); wouldn't it be better to
>> collect all the different import/export functions under one common
>> group, like the existing rcs ("revision control systems") or, to avoid
>> the RCS analogy, "vcs"?
>
> Maybe "ovcs", for Other, Overaged, Obscure or Outrageous VCS?
>
> Other than that, I agree with Thomas that a single command group for all
> import/export/push/pull/sync mechanisms to/from other VCSen is plenty.
> It's not like we have such an overwhelming amount of conversion commands.
>
> (I'd also love to see the underscore in cvs_import and git_export
> vanish. But that's another issue..)
What about two commands with subcommands, "export" and "import", where
we could have
mtn export git
mtn import cvs
for now?
Of course this is bikeshed discussion and still doesn't solve the issue
where to put these - having two groups already with only one command
(database, automation) is already stupid enough - and a command group
cannot be specified in the commandline either, so an "import" and
"export" group is equally stupid.
Thomas.
--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | tommyd3...@jabber.ccc.de | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
