Ethan Blanton wrote:
Note that it is actually sufficient to sign only the newest known good revisions, and the transitive closure of the revision graph will capture all good revisions.
Is this "sufficient in theory" (ie. that's enough to compute the proper trust), or "sufficient in practice" (ie. monotone will already be sufficiently happy and not complain about invalid certs etc if I just sign the most recent revision)
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
