On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Timothy Brownawell <tbrow...@prjek.net>wrote:
> > 'update' is now noisy when modifying a file with mtn:execute set, but at > least it doesn't lose the execute bits. > That's intentional, I was hoping it would be helpful and not too annoying. The code that fiddles with the execute bits now logs things when it actually makes changes. I don't have a problem reverting this bit if people don't like it though. Reverting "attr set <file> mtn:execute true" doesn't seem to clear the > execute bit (looks like it didn't before, either). It also doesn't give > I suppose it would if revert was done through the editable tree interface but that has other problems. I wonder if creating a cset that would do the revert but then dropping everything but the attr changes from it and using that would be a reasonable way of reverting attribute changes? > any output like it would for reverting a change to file contents, > probably because the execute bits didn't actually get changed (even > though the mtn:execute change is undone). That sounds about right. If revert was smart enough to revert that then the change in execute bits would be logged. Cheers, Derek
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel