Derek Scherger <de...@echologic.com> writes: > Another thought on this that I've had floating around for a while is that > perhaps rather than starting a second process and running netsync over stdio > we could have two separate database instances open and sync between them > from within a single process. I haven't looked at this in any detail at all > so it might just be a crazy idea, but I think it would avoid all of the > windows related network issues. Maybe some of the refactoring that zack and > markus did a while ago relating to app_state, options and database arguments > in various api's would make the idea of having two open database objects > less crazy?
That solves the file: problem on Win32. But it doesn't allow ssh: to a Win32 server. Although, with a Win32 server, you're more likely to be exporting a file share containing the database anyway. -- -- Stephe _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
