On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 04:53:59PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On 2011-05-20 4:46 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: >> GPLv3 was heavily reviewed before it was released, and has been out for >> almost 4 years. >> >> Can you elaborate? >> >> I'm sure there are good reasons not to bother going to GPLv3, but I >> don't understand what you mean by "premature". > > Switching to GPL3 would make us license-incompatible with a large body > of code (everything under a copyleft that isn't v3-compatible, in > particular, code under v2-only). It would also make us > license-compatible with a large body of code (anything that adds > restrictions that are okay with v3 but not v2).
GLP2+ is compatible with GPL2. GLP2+ is compatible with GPL3. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
