Stephen,

On 05/01/2014 07:36 PM, Stephen Leake wrote:
> Well, I started a separate file just in case. It turns out it is very
> different; much simpler, since most of the dependent packages are
> already packaged for MinGW64, and we can use 'pacman' to install them.

pacman? Didn't read about that. Sounds good. The MinGW-w64 variant I
fetched had *less* than the 32-bit one. Which one do you use?

> The 64 bit changes are mostly due to Windows using a different
> underlying type for socket_type than Unix. There are many changes;

That worries me a tad.

> anything that checks for an invalid socket, some function return or
> parameter types. The code is definitely cleaner after the fixes, so I
> don't think it will break anything on 32 bit.

Phew, okay. Please try to keep the changes minimal.

> I've already done most of the work, but not commited or run the tests
> yet; I'll commit it on a branch.

Can you get this done by Friday night? I planned to release this weekend.

> I work much better when there are no spurious warnings; it's easier to
> see the real problems in the compiler output.
> 
> So I'll add -Wno-unused-parameter to suppress the warnings, and take it
> out on the branch.

You can always do `./configure CXXFLAGS="-Wno-unused-parameter"` - then
there's nothing to take out.

Regards

Markus


_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Reply via email to