On 05/04/2014 12:06 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
> So I guess the timestamp that it supposed to handle
> ("1901-12-13T20:45:51") should not be acceptable with a 32 bit time_t
> and it should fail in such a case.Exactly. While time_t itself is 64-bits, some mktime internals are not. Maybe Apple just doesn't care about dates prior 1902. Maybe I should have done the same rather than the extensive check. It's not like people use monotone to handle such dates... Regards Markus Wanner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
