Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> writes: > while COPYING states GPL-2+ as the license for monotone, I just figured > there's exactly two files in the source that state GPL-3+: > src/{unix,win32}/parse_date.cc. You introduced these back in May 2010 in > rev a8147b11, when splitting functionality from dates.cc into these two > platform specific variants.
Right. > I realize the has been some discussion regarding switching to GPL-3+ > (search the archives for "GPLv3 code in monotone"), but to me the thread > doesn't quite look like an agreement has been reached for a move to > GPL-3+. Right; it was a mistake to use GPLv3 in that code. > Maybe that needs to be revisited, now? Stephen, do you want to pursue > a move to GPL-3+, again? I'm always in favor of moving to GPLv3, but I don't think anything has changed in this regard. > Alternatively, please resolve the ambiguity by clearly allowing > distribution of those files under GPL v2 as well, i.e. change the boiler > plate there to state "GNU GPL version 2.0 or greater", as other source > files still do. Thanks. Done -- -- Stephe _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel