Dick:
How interesting that you bought a Nonsuch 26. I just sold my Nonsuch 30 and
bought a Montgomery 17. As you may know, the 30s all have cored hulls and
decks while the 26s have solid fiberglass hulls. I have heard of some 30s
with blister problems but it's rare. I loved my Nonsuch but it was too much
boat ($$$) for me. The 26 is an excellent compromise and one I would
consider if I ever decide to go up in size. It certainly can sail rings
around the boats mentioned here.
Maria

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: M_Boats: Bones: Flicka resin/date question


> When I was looking around for a bigger boat than the M23 that "Bones" now
owns, I
> looked at several 1975-79 era Norsea 27s, they all had significant osmotic
> blisters particularly at the turn of the bilge. That was one reason I
bought a
> Nonsuch 26 instead.
> Dick
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 3/21/02 6:52:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > << Scott,
> >
> > Looks like you have you have been doing your homework on the Flickas.
> > Ever looked closely at it's bigger brother the Dana? Quite a boat.
> > I have heard similar stories of blister problems on earlier Flickas, I
> > believe pre '88. It was due to resin formulation. A Lake Superior Flicka
> > owner by the name of Sterling Weatherford has his referb story posted on
> > the web.
> > Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
> >
> > Later,
> >
> > Bones >>
> >
> > Hi Bones,
> > Thank you for the follow-up.  I 've been aboard a few Dana's, but have
yet to
> > sail one.  I met Bill Crealock (the designer) once, and we discussed the
> > relative merits of the different 'pocket cruisers' (or tabloid yachts,
if you
> > subscribe to Jay Benford's theory that pocket cruisers refer to
powerboats
> > only).  I like the Dana very much, although I favor the outboard rudder
and
> > more plumb bow of the Flicka.  At 8000 pounds, I group the Dana more in
with
> > the Nor ' Sea 27 and the Falmouth Cutter.  All three are trailerable,
but not
> > so easily as the Flicka (easy being a very relative term!!), and the
price of
> > entry is a little rich for my blood of late (Used Dana's seem to start
around
> > the $50K mark, and ramp up quickly depending on age and condition).  I
would
> > love to be in a position to consider any of the three larger boats, but
alas,
> > that is not where I find myself these days.
> >
> > Thanks for bringing up Sterling Weatherford's story regarding hull
> > hydrolyzation and repairs.  I discovered this just prior to almost
purchasing
> > a 1985 Flicka with some seemingly superficial blisters.  I credit him
with
> > possibly saving me thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours of work.
When
> > I spoke with him, he was quick to point out that not all boats of this
period
> > suffered the same maladies, but there is certainly reason to look very
> > carefully.
> >
> > I was interested to hear from you that PSC changed their resin in 1988.
I am
> > trying to corroborate this date, as I would like to concentrate my
search on
> > newer boats.  Could you tell me where you heard the 1988 date?  Others I
have
> > talked to have said the same thing.  Some say it was not until 1989.
The
> > factory doesn't seem to know (apparently there is nobody left there from
the
> > original days, and now it is under different ownership).
> >
> > As silly as it might seem, I intend to keep my M15 even if I do find a
> > Flicka.  I just can't stand to part with it (at least not yet, and while
I
> > would likely haul the Flicka to some distant location every few years
(Alaska
> > from Seattle/Bellingham is first on the list), I can see popping up to
BC or
> > down to the Sea of Cortez on short notice with the M15.  There is also
lake
> > sailing to consider.
> >
> > Do I understand that you bought an M23?  If so, congratulations!  I will
be
> > eager to hear your further reports!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Scott Grometer
> > M15 #478, "bebe"
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
>


_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats

Reply via email to