Thanks all for the comments about the 2 HP Honda.  The issue about the dingy
motor mount modification stemmed from a conversation I had with the dealer
from whom I bought our Zodiac.  He indicated that with a long shaft
outboard, I would need to space up the longer shaft so that the motor would
work correctly (possibly a water intake issue as I remember).  Over the
years it never made sense to me.  The only thing I could possibly come up
with was that the longer shaft would have more overturning torque if it was
cranked up when turned at 90 degrees to the centerline of the dingy.  Does
anyone know if this long shaft issue with a dingy mount is fact, myth, or
personal misunderstanding?  

My Zodiac 260 is suppose to support a 4 HP motor, but the existing exchange
of the 2 HP motor from the stern rail of a bigger boat to the dingy mount
was always a defining moment for how the day would go!  The extra mass of a
4 HP motor is just that much more to deal with.

At any rate, if there ever was any truth to the water intake issue, it would
not be a problem for the Honda 2.  Currently (I will put on my NASCAR hat
and say) I am running a Honda "big block" 7.5 HP motor.  It runs great,
quiet, reliable, and fuel efficient and all that; but it is just a beast to
heft up to the transom.  With a Honda 7.5, Johnson 4.5, and a Johnson 2 in
my quiver of possibilities, I would like to consolidate motors and come up
with one to accommodate the M17 and Zodiac.  At first glance the Honda 2
would seem a little underpowered, but it might make a great compromise.

Steve Shenkel
M17 263 _/) <><
Arizona


-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: M_Boats: Outboard Motor selection

In a message dated 9/15/2005 8:53:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A kicker for a dingy?  Are there any mounting modifications necessary to
utilize the long shaft feature on a dingy motor mount?
Well, on second thought a long shaft on a short shaft transome sure would
put 
the prop and lower unit at risk. However, I think it's doable if the Honda 
was tilted up a bit, sort of running like the larger motors in the "shallow 
water drive position."

The Honda 2hp is a bit noisy, considering it's output. I think it's because 
of the air cooling and that it's a single cylinder, which may make it
vibrate 
more than a twin cylinder.
"IF" you've alrady got the need for the 2hp on you Monty I'd certainly give 
it a try on the dinghy. The concern I would have is regarding the sailing
area.
Bill
_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats


_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats

Reply via email to