Hi Stevan! On Friday 09 May 2008, Stevan Little wrote: > Shlomi, > > On May 8, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP: "Every sufficiently complex > > Class::Accessor > > program contains contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug- > > ridden, slow > > implementation of half of Moose." > > Very nice, I like that quote, if you don't mind I will likely include > it in the YAPC::NA talk I am gonna give.
No, I don't mind at all, and it will be a pleasure to see myself quoted there. (An attribution would be nice, and linking to the original Greenspun quote). There are more quotes by me here: * http://www.shlomifish.org/humour.html * http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/fortunes/ > > Skimming over your code, I think you could save a lot of code by > moving to Moose, and using some MooseX:: (specifically > MooseX::AttribtueHelpers, MooseX::Object::Pluggable, and likely a few > more too). I see, thanks. I'll probably consult you people on IRC about some stuff. > > You will find, as others who are porting other Class::Accessor code > to Moose, that there are some Class::Accessor-isms that conflict with > Moose-isms so be watchful during the port. Otherwise, i think you > will find you can clean up your code pretty well using Moose :) OK, thanks. I think I'll set up a separate svn branch on svn.berlios.de for the Moose conversion, so I'll be able to do the conversion incrementally without breaking the trunk and so that I can continue fixing bugs, etc. in the trunk in case I need to. Thanks again. Regards, Shlomi Fish > > - Stevan > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Parody on "The Fountainhead" - http://xrl.us/bjria The bad thing about hardware is that it sometimes work and sometimes doesn't. The good thing about software is that it's consistent: it always does not work, and it always does not work in exactly the same way.
