If there's a better place to ask this, please point me in the right direction. I've been a lurker and have searched the archive and docs but haven't found all that much regarding naming conventions for moose roles.
For this example, say i want to provide functionality to do Drawing. I've seen roles named along the lines of Drawable, DoesDraw, DoesDrawing, but no reference as to any set standard. >From an english standpoint, none of those sound all that great when combined with the keyword 'with', either (with 'Drawable' or with 'DoesDrawing') I've been working with the present continuous (progressive? - i'm not a verb tense guru) form of a verb when writing a role with the implementation being something that is capable of that verb, e.g. package Drawing; use Moose::Role ----- package Custom::Drawable; with 'Drawing'; ---- package main; my $drawable = new Custom::Drawable; but am appealing for advice on any established conventions or suggestions as to how to proceed. My approach breaks down with the Moose::Manual example of a Car object implementing/consuming a Breakable role which is part of what spurred this email because i'm sure someone has put a lot more thought into it :-) -- Jarrod
