On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:30:41AM +0200, Tuomas Jormola wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:31:52PM -0600, Jesse Luehrs wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:54:04PM -0600, Jesse Luehrs wrote: > > > Maybe this is another point in favor of dropping the > > > whole "legal options" concept in general? > > > > perigrin on IRC pointed out that we've been thinking about replacing the > > legal_options_for_inheritance method with an > > illegal_options_for_inheritance method, and that would solve your > > problem as well, and is probably the best solution. Interested in > > trying to implement that? > I've implemented this, it's just that I haven't managed to get commit access > to > Moose git repo yet so I can't push it as a new topic on the master git repo. I > try to investigate this on IRC later tonight UTC+3. topics/inversed-legal-attribute-option-inheritance published at the Moose Git repository for review. As discussed on IRC it's not mergeable as is since it's not backwards compatible with code that relies on legal_options_for_inheritance.
Tuomas > > -- > Tuomas Jormola <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
