On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Stevan Little wrote:
Looks good, however I think MooseX::Depedency is too general a name, how about MooseX::Types::Dependent::Types?
I don't think this is what dependent types means. Also, I'm not sure this has anything to do with types at all. This is really about whether a value is _required_.
Maybe MX::Attribute::Dependent or something like that. -dave /*============================================================ http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) ============================================================*/
