This does not look like a sane thing to try to do.
And what is your definition of "finished compiling"? Is every closure
instantiation a new compilation?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Peter Shangov <pshan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is there a sane way to specify a callback to be executed every time a
> subroutine has finished compiling? The `signatures` pragma currently does
> this but with XS, which is beyond my hacking abilities. If there is something
> like an API for hooking into subroutine creation, sugar method keywords could
> thrigger it too.
>
> --
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Jesse Luehrs <d...@tozt.net>
>>To: Peter Shangov <pshan...@yahoo.com>
>>Cc: moose <moose@perl.org>
>>Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012, 22:05
>>Subject: Re: "automatically" wrapping methods.
>>
>>On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 01:58:40PM -0800, Peter Shangov wrote:
>>> Or you can use B::Hooks::EndOfScope to do the wrapping at the end of the
>>> compilation stage:
>>>
>>> # untested code
>>> package MooseX::MethodValidation;
>>> use B::Hooks::EndOfScope;
>>> sub import {
>>> on_scope_end {
>>> my $caller = caller;
>>> my $meta = Moose::Meta::Class->initialize($caller);
>>> foreach my $method ( $meta->get_all_methods ) {
>>> ... # wrapping code goes here
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> package MyModel::User;
>>> use MooseX::MethodValidation;
>>> ... # your subs go here
>>
>>This actually isn't a great idea, because not all methods are defined at
>>compile time. If you declare any methods via method modifiers, or
>>attributes, or any other method declaration sugar, they won't exist when
>>that validation code runs.
>>
>>-doy
>>
>>
>>
