This would almost definitely be my definition of MooseX vs MooseY.
-Chris — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Caleb Cushing <xenoterrac...@gmail.com> wrote: > so at YAPC it was again mentioned that you shouldn't use MooseX for > things that don't actually extend moose. It occurred to me that MooseY > might actually make for a good namespace for things that aren't really > big enough to stand on their own, and are really only applicable in > the context of Moose, such as roles, non moose subclasses, etc. > MooseY because Y is after X and because some of these things make > sense to call them "Moosey" > Does anyone having any opinions on this? > -- > Caleb Cushing > http://xenoterracide.com
